The Supreme Court of India earlier had a differing view. In the case of Maharshi Dayanand University v. Surjeet Kaur(2010) 11 SCC 159, relying upon all earlier judgments, the Supreme Court held that education is not a commodity. Educational institutions are not providing any kind of service, therefore, in the matter of admission; fees etc.,
Education within ambit of services.
Education within ambit of services
The Supreme Court of India earlier had a differing view. In the case of Maharshi Dayanand University v. Surjeet Kaur(2010) 11 SCC 159, relying upon all earlier judgments, the Supreme Court held that education is not a commodity. Educational institutions are not providing any kind of service, therefore, in the matter of admission; fees etc.,
The Supreme Court of India earlier had a differing view. In the case of Maharshi Dayanand University v. Surjeet Kaur(2010) 11 SCC 159, relying upon all earlier judgments, the Supreme Court held that education is not a commodity. Educational institutions are not providing any kind of service, therefore, in the matter of admission; fees etc.,
0 comments:
Post a Comment